impala dude 831
Forum Newbie
Posts: 81
Loc: Salinas,ca
Reg: 06-25-12
|
 07-10-12 02:58 AM - Post#2246447
In response to arnieg141
I bet all those 6 thousand posts are myths lol...dam...wing drag stories ,and wreck yard car stories..59 and 66 bottom of the list ya rite pal!! Read this and weep.59 is the first ever impala period hate on that not me.its the best design hands down,have u ever took the time guys I mean all u,take 10 minutes per picture u see 58 threw 72 ,take time to realize the craft,the lines,the chromes,stance,grill design,on every year.do it and u will notice the 58 is boxed up mini roof,little back window like a bel air,check a 59 wow u will notice a thing a beauty.really.they took so much time in the creation on that new poster car to represent the future lineup what they did was make a car no other impala can match one year stand alone (TRUE) IMPALA .no bel air .here's my view like it or hate it...58 I mentioned,59 can't mess with,60 real clean design more simple and rounder body,clean lines rather then sharp 63 lines if u KNOW what I mean,61 is funky ,drag strip ride ,small and bubble top kills it,not everybody likes a bubble top belive me.hardly mentioned.62 is nice in ss black inside,clean lines bit if u look at it from panoramic view of the whole driver side poster shot it leans to much certain ways ..cool but can't top 59,63 has hard cuts front and sides and back rear,u either love it hate it period.its a tuff design really.but can't bump a 59 of the table.64 is everywhere ..over 100 something thousand made or more ,not to rare can't compete,plain look ,boxed effect for a cleaner look I guess,one long chrome for ss with turned aluminum,and in the rear make it sweet but can't knock a 59 .65 is considered a fastback impala its a coupe fastback can't compair,real sport coupe impala 59 vs fastbacks na.that means 66 has zero chance I will admit Chevrolet designers in the late 60's were losing options in design belive me u COULD tell everywhere on that year.they rushed it out maybe didn't put a lot of thought into the craft,the extra should we go with this,should we go with that got rushed.flaw design plain rear ,boring rear to say truthfully.front is weaker also.chromes on it what's chromes the ones under the fenders and one thin chrome running the side of the car, and one plain mini rocker chrome boring..67 has cool cuts but it has never gotten love for sum reason,don't like it can't knock a 59.so were off to the 68 u kidding me 68 ,no comment bypass sorry 68 owners ,69 is awful design really,I think the original designers of the famous years left mid 60's that's why the cars fell off the impact meter..70 and so on were the last straws for the lineup,cars sold but they were not beautys,rare designs,classic one of a kind looks are when impalas got introduced,after 64 its a wrap.but I think u hate 59 and 66 cuz u bash the real deal.makes no sense where's your head at ..I don't think your a real Chevy (IMPALA)       guy like me, u mite just like old chevys ..
|
Gain extra benefits by becoming a Supporting Member 
drtyler (4)
